All replies (38)
Guest
10 years ago
Hello Istanbul
Oh, thanks for the correction. I'll pass that on straight away. Maybe something can be done.
Best regards
Tanja
10 years ago
@Istanbul: Many thanks from me for the supportive comment
and best regards,
maripac
10 years ago
Edited
Dear Tanja,
Thank you for your reply. What bothers me [as with the other 'concerns' mentioned...] is the fact that this login problem never occurred on the "old platform" - and currently appears very often, but not every time I visit.
I have of course read Sergio's informative article, but in the previous post I asked for another "in-depth review" of the concerns mentioned(https://community.migros.ch/m/Neues-Migipedia-da-ist-noch-der/Wie-geht-das-neu/td-p/244085/page/3. By this I mean a serious discussion and visualization of the respective advantages and disadvantages - or rather pro and contra arguments for a return to
- the deletion and editing function everywhere on Migipedia
- the admission of guests
(although some links to these concerns can be found in the post on the 'interim balance page':https://community.migros.ch/m/Community/Neues-Migipedia-eine-Zwischenbilanz/ba-p/309367
I hope and request that these two points will be carefully addressed again, so that Migipedia will no longer appear so off-putting [to certain writers] and so unwelcoming [to interested parties/guests].
Grateful for the knowledge and hoping for accommodating action
maripac
10 years ago
Edited
@Tanja_Migros
I can understand the problems, I had them at the beginning too, but if you use the systems optimally, the log-in is a small disruptive factor. Sometimes long waiting times after "Submit" are more annoying for me - but there are worse things.
Let's stay with the log-in.
I deleted the history on my notebook & co. yesterday, so I was able to log in to Migipedia this morning:
@maripac
There is no going back, once you have crossed the"point of no return" or the"Rubicon*" in a project, here the migration, you can only go forward, and that was sometime in mid-August.
Best regards
Istanbul
*Crossing the Rubicon in educational language: taking a decisive step for everything later: "Rubico(n)" was the name of the border river Caesar crossed in 49 BC between Gallia Cisalpina (the land of the Po) and Italy proper. The crossing triggered a civil war, as a result of which Caesar came to power. The river is said to have taken a different course to the Fiumicino, which today flows into the Adriatic north of Ravenna and has officially been called the Rubicone since 1932. In the 15th century, Rimini and Cesena even fought a lawsuit for the honor of owning the famous river on their territory.
Source: Duden; idioms.
Guest
10 years ago
Hello everyone
I can really understand the annoyance with the system. Compared to the old Migipedia, several systems work together in the new one. We are aware that the registration process here is not quite perfect yet and we are working to ensure that the transitions are as imperceptible as possible for you and work smoothly.
As far as your other requests are concerned, I can assure you that we are carefully considering every decision in connection with Migipedia and - as you requested - weighing up the pros and cons.
At the moment, we have opted for the paths that Sergio has explained in the article. If we find that our approach doesn't work for one or other decision, we will certainly go back over the books. I hope you trust us when I tell you that we only want the best for Migipedia.
Thanks to your suggestions, we are keeping a close eye on the points you mentioned and discuss them regularly as a team.
Best regards
Tanja
Guest
10 years ago
Thank you @Frederica for your additional feedback and the detailed listing of the application process.
Best regards
Tanja
10 years ago
Edited
Hello Tanja, hello Istanbul,
thank you for your answers and for your interesting comment Istanbul.
Having said that, I'm not familiar enough with the IT sector to be able to judge this "point of no return" or the"Rubicon*", so I apologize if my way of looking at things doesn't apply here.
However, with regard to projects in general - in various areas of life - I wonder about this self-drawn boundary or restriction. In many cases, isn't there a return to the tried and tested - in the sense that elements of an earlier phase are taken up again and their integration into a more or less new environment is (possibly repeatedly) tested and discussed?
In the project 'All-round renewal of Migipedia', the "interim report" shows that a 'return' to various elements of the previous Migipedia is still pending/underway(https://community.migros.ch/m/Community/Neues-Migipedia-eine-Zwischenbilanz/ba-p/309367 - keywords "improvements", optimization etc.).
Against the background of the "compromises", "feedback and discussions" activities also mentioned, I have asked for a renewed examination of the aspects mentioned. [Again, as far as I can judge with my rudimentary technical knowledge:] I do not think that
- the deletion and editing function everywhere on Migipedia
- the admission of guests
(some links and comments on these concerns can be found on the 'interim review' page:https://community.migros.ch/m/Community/Neues-Migipedia-eine-Zwischenbilanz/ba-p/309367
would be major/incisive changes that would cause serious damage to Migipedia. In other words: it wouldn't really be a big deal - but the resulting advantages, the concession and the message to all [ever active on Migipedia] guests would be big.
Best regards back,
maripac