1 question
Why is there no longer an attachment on the spreader to make dosing easier?
Hello VanZan, thank you very much for your review. In fact, for the sake of the environment, we decided to do without the dosing cap for the large containers. However, the switch was made several years ago. We hope these lines give you an understanding of our reasons and that you can still see a positive side to the change. Best regards, your M-Infoline team
I think the changeover was only introduced with the new design last year? In any case, if you look at the latest comments, a lot of people seem to be bothered by it. And if you then simply buy the smaller version to have a dosing aid, the environmental aspect is gone again. The same applies if you waste an unnecessary amount of spice. The competition has also managed to integrate a dosing aid directly into the lid. Perhaps that would be worth considering?
Hello VanZan, the adjustment was already made before the changeover to the M-Classic brand. We have submitted your feedback to our specialist department. Best regards, your M-Infoline team
Oh, stop with the greenwashing blah-blah about not using sprinkles! Or else explain (at last!) why the paprika in the refill bag per 100g of product is KEUR less than when I buy it in a large jar with a plastic lid!
Both then go - very environmentally friendly... - to the trash, because next time I'll buy the jar with the plastic lid again (but, yay dear environment, without the sprinkling insert!) in order to buy the actual contents (the paprika) at a cheaper price!
Sorry, do you realize now and then what a load of garbage you're talking and how incredibly stupid you must think your customers are?! So: offer a jar with a plastic lid AND a sprinkle insert, offer refill packs more cheaply as a packaging product, and the environment is helped, because then I don't throw away a new full pack every few weeks and buy a new one, but refill it intelligently and lucratively! It's actually all self-explanatory and immediately obvious, isn't it!
Refill bags are filled semi-automatically and not completely by machine like the jar. This means that a person is still needed to fill the refill bag, which makes the product more expensive. This was mentioned in another article.
I won't comment on the rest...
It doesn't matter whether the "real" price of the contents of the refill bag would be more expensive than the full product: an intelligent product manager calculates across the board and intelligently generates a sensible final price for the related products, which is perceived as appropriate by the customer ("WHAT, we should focus on the customer?!")!
You're really acting like hobby wannabe marketers who can't think beyond the end of their own noses! And: You can also not comment on something by... attention, here it comes... simply NOT speaking out. There's no need for a rhetorical, pseudo-ambiguous reference to not speaking out.
Why should Migros queer-subsidize a product? I think and also claim that Migros sells the jar massively more than the refill pack, which also lowers the price.
(It also says so in the Srf report from 2019) Smaller packs are usually more expensive anyway, so you don't have to be a sales professional... I agree and think there should be a lot more refill packs. I think it's a shame that cinnamon is still not available. On the subject of what I haven't commented on... if retailers don't do anything to reduce plastic, they are criticized. If they do something, it's not right either, because then you have to limit yourself. See stickers instead of plastic on organic products... Whether Coop or Migros, aldi or lidl...
Log in and get involved!
Why? You can only test, rate and make Migros even better if you're logged in.