Migipedia

Guest

is unbelievable to me. Until just now I only read along from the outside, when you see what is going on in here, the question arises for me is Migipedia only a "FAKEPORTAL" where users are bullied and insulted, others are thrown out and blocked by the community managers and as soon as they disappear they are back like HAMILTON alias MIGIFERKEL (writing + picture). How long should this go on like this for me Migipedia is only unbelievable and a joke, because you are only "put off" by those responsible here. Have a nice eveningMigifake

(Machine translation)

All replies (11)

Guest

You may be right about your first sentence, migifake.

I was the first to rate the new hazelnut bird's nests with one star because the packaging is now a composite material. That's not sustainable, it's an unnecessary waste of paper and doesn't fit in with the environmental awareness that Migros always claims to have. The day after my review, a 5-year-old review by Laurinaa was posted with 5 stars, so the bird's nests now have 3 stars and not just one. What is this, Migros? The old rating does not apply to the new Vogelnestli because they are a new product "without preservatives" and "with natural flavor". They have nothing to do with the old Vogelnestli and so Lurinaa's rating is cheated. Is this now an infringement or misuse of intellectual property, because Laurinaa has rated a completely different product? In any case, it has nothing to do with the truth. The first part of Migifake's last sentence is spot on.

products.migros.ch/haselnut-vogelnestli-110108900000

Today Daniel emailed me to ask if this was my first time on Migipedia. My writing style seemed strange to him. Migros seems strange to me too. It should be possible to find out technically, but as I'm not a specialist, I asked around. The admin at the company where I work shook his head when I told him this and showed him the email. I didn't understand all of his explanation, only that it should be child's play to identify the sender with the data of every message and every e-mail if you know something about it. Migros doesn't seem to understand any of this. He thinks Migros is quite funny and wants to do some tests there.

I've known Migipedia for a long time and have been reading here since last year. It wasn't necessary to register and participate because there were some critical authors who wrote or asked what I thought. But the topic of bee promises got me excited and when I bought the new bird's nests, my hat went up. Shrink-wrapped in a double pack, I only noticed the new composite packaging when I opened the foil. So I registered and asked my questions, to which there are still no real answers.

Daniel told me that I can only rate products that I have tried myself, otherwise my profile will be deleted immediately. Do I now have to prove with the receipt that I also bought the new Spitzbuben and other goods? Or do I have to send a photo of myself eating cookies? What's the point of rating at all if Migros postpones positive ratings of other or old products? This has nothing to do with honesty or credibility.

The "User of the week" on the homepage is just as untrustworthy. In the activity feed of Andreachrista's profile, you can see that the last likes were received a month ago. But she has been User of the Week for at least two weeks. That's cheating.

(Machine translation)

Guest

Addendum:
I googled the Vogelnestli and found an old question from 2014 to which there was never an answer. So the Vogelnestli have been changed at least twice since Laurinaa's rating: in 2014 and 2016. This sheds a new light on Laurinaa's postponed rating. The rating really has no place where it is now. Why does Migros do this stuff? And why did Antonia never answer jebadaya's question?

community.migros.ch/m/Forum-Migipedia/Neue-Haselnuss-Vogelnestli/td-p/329433

(Machine translation)

Guest

Giving masses of ratings because a product or its packaging is not 'sustainable' enough? What's next, rating all products that are not from Switzerland or not organic with one star by script?

Well, I can do that too ... but in the other direction. Of course, this doesn't make sense, as the ratings are supposed to reflect what you don't see at first glance when you look at the product on the shelf. So in particular the taste qualities.

(Machine translation)

Guest

>>>>the ratings are supposed to reflect what you don't see at first glance when you look at the product on the shelf. So especially the taste qualities. <<<

You can rate the taste qualities of packaged goods that you see on the shelf? Well, I can't do that.

(Machine translation)

Guest

Me neither. The reviews are helpful for this. And that's why you should only rate a product if you have bought and tried it.

Otherwisewhatcomes out?

(Machine translation)

Guest

I didn't rate anything en masse either, I still have all the receipts. I think it's a shame to get such emails from Migros when they themselves cheat and don't answer many questions or don't answer them correctly. I don't know what you're trying to say with the Amazon link, but I'm not interested in that either. I think you only come here to provoke and I don't want to discuss anything with you. I want answers to my questions from Migros.

(Machine translation)

MigrosWiesel

>>>You can judge the taste qualities of packaged goods that you see on the shelf? Well, I can't do that. <<<
If you can read, you have a clear advantage:
>>>the ratings are supposed to reflect in particular what you don't see at first glance when you look at the product on the shelf.<<<

(Machine translation)

Guest

The Amazon link is a nice example of what happens when people give joke reviews. Funny to read. But also completely useless.

Your reviews say absolutely nothing about the quality of the product. They are just as useless as those of ivan92 or the now-deleted Fonero (if ivan92 isn't Fonero anyway).

And yes, I like to provoke. Especially the no-eco-organic-whole-grain-veganism-will-be-all-dead-tomorrow moral preachers. A bit of desensitizing trolling.

(Machine translation)

Guest

addition to last night's question:
how do you envision "MIGIPEDIAS" future, i.e. as it is now Guaranteed never not

(Machine translation)

stecki

I started a similar discussion months ago. What's going on here at the moment is simply a mess on the part of Migros and the moderators. You're being lied to, screwed, used, ignored and taken for a fool wherever possible (and recently even threatened by moderators via PN). In between, they do some crowdsourcing to show outsiders and the media how great this platform is. But as soon as critical questions are asked, they lie through their teeth. Not Migros!

(Machine translation)

1 2