Guest
Migros doesn't like some topics and has blocked them, even though they would actually be very interesting to discuss:
Too bad Migros is trying to prevent discussions on these topics or why have these posts been blocked?
Guest
Migros doesn't like some topics and has blocked them, even though they would actually be very interesting to discuss:
Too bad Migros is trying to prevent discussions on these topics or why have these posts been blocked?
I would also be very interested in this. Why are posts on Migipedia blocked?
Are we no longer allowed to discuss organic food, the environment, sustainability, etc. on Migipedia?
I think it's a shame that people are no longer allowed to talk openly about these topics.
I would also be very interested in this. Why are posts on Migipedia blocked?
Are we no longer allowed to discuss organic food, the environment, sustainability, etc. on Migipedia?
I think it's a shame that people are no longer allowed to talk openly about these topics.
Guest
I wouldn't like "muzzling" either,
but that Ivan92, with his "new" "accounts" and posts, is rigorously banned
and I think it's related to that.
The blocking is not about the topics per se, but about individual users who wanted to educate everyone else
I see it differently. If it were really only about the user in question, you could block the user. But Migros would prefer to sweep all unpleasant topics under the carpet.
And as far as "educating" is concerned: drawing attention to really enormous problems has nothing to do with educating, but telling a user what they can and can't post does.
I agree with schneebaer47 and moz79,
that "trolls" are rigorously banned is great! Bravo!
Nothing new was brought to the blocked topics!
But only, like a prayer wheel, the same "Chabis" over and over again
posted again and again! Therefore, in my opinion, it is absolutely ok that they were blocked!
Yes, you can!
But reasonably and not like those banned users!
Everyone has their own opinion!
If you disagree, those who opened the thread shouldn't keep "banging on"
until it gets too stupid for those with a different opinion!
I also think it's enough to block individual disagreeable users. But if all posts are blocked where disagreeable users write something, then the whole of Migipedia could be blocked. Twitter etc. would also have to be blocked. When you hear and read what is tweeted by "official" politicians, then Migipedia is just too harmless...
This post about blocked posts should actually also be blocked? Because this post was opened by a user who has since been banned?
From that point of view, it makes no sense to block everything, because I should actually be blocked now too, because I'm just about to write something here...
Guest
@Loxiran
well blocking helps, but with Ivan92 and Co. there is something else due, growl hisses ?
and I hope/wish that those responsible for Migipedia will finally implement what we want. ?
Imperator: You heard the admins, only comments à la "fine, delicious, too expensive etc." about products that you have bought and tried yourself are welcome. Don't write anything critical, especially not if you haven't tried the product.
@stecki
can you send me a link where I can see what the admins or community managers allow you to write here and what not? Have I overlooked this?
I sometimes find that there are products that I can't buy and have to put back on the store shelf if I find something that is not acceptable to me. Be it if it has palm oil in it unnecessarily, or if the product comes from China or Africa or whatever. I may then find an alternative in the Coop or whatever. If I describe my buying or non-buying behavior calmly and objectively, why am I not allowed to write about it here?
Guest
I wouldn't like "muzzling" either,
but that Ivan92, with his "new" "accounts" and posts, is rigorously banned
and I think it's related to that.
The blocking is not about the topics per se, but about individual users who wanted to educate everyone else
I see it differently. If it were really only about the user in question, you could block the user. But Migros would prefer to sweep all unpleasant topics under the carpet.
And as far as "educating" is concerned: drawing attention to really enormous problems has nothing to do with educating, but telling a user what they can and can't post does.
I agree with schneebaer47 and moz79,
that "trolls" are rigorously banned is great! Bravo!
Nothing new was brought to the blocked topics!
But only, like a prayer wheel, the same "Chabis" over and over again
posted again and again! Therefore, in my opinion, it is absolutely ok that they were blocked!
Yes, you can!
But reasonably and not like those banned users!
Everyone has their own opinion!
If you disagree, those who opened the thread shouldn't keep "banging on"
until it gets too stupid for those with a different opinion!
I also think it's enough to block individual disagreeable users. But if all posts are blocked where disagreeable users write something, then the whole of Migipedia could be blocked. Twitter etc. would also have to be blocked. When you hear and read what is tweeted by "official" politicians, then Migipedia is just too harmless...
This post about blocked posts should actually also be blocked? Because this post was opened by a user who has since been banned?
From that point of view, it makes no sense to block everything, because I should actually be blocked now too, because I'm just about to write something here...
Guest
@Loxiran
well blocking helps, but with Ivan92 and Co. there is something else due, growl hisses ?
and I hope/wish that those responsible for Migipedia will finally implement what we want. ?
Imperator: You heard the admins, only comments à la "fine, delicious, too expensive etc." about products that you have bought and tried yourself are welcome. Don't write anything critical, especially not if you haven't tried the product.
@stecki
can you send me a link where I can see what the admins or community managers allow you to write here and what not? Have I overlooked this?
I sometimes find that there are products that I can't buy and have to put back on the store shelf if I find something that is not acceptable to me. Be it if it has palm oil in it unnecessarily, or if the product comes from China or Africa or whatever. I may then find an alternative in the Coop or whatever. If I describe my buying or non-buying behavior calmly and objectively, why am I not allowed to write about it here?
