In Kassensturz, Migros claims that the origin of the Fruit Rolls strawberry (with 1% strawberry) from South Africa is a customer need to send snacks halfway around the world due to the very long transport route. Please let us readers know if this is really a need.
But you don't care that pecan nuts come from the USA... didn't know that the nuts generally grow so abundantly in Europe...
This is also a valuable and sensible way of providing aid to third countries. Instead of always supporting Africa with money, you help them by buying their products. Do you remember the saying "Give a fisherman money and he can live on it for a day, show and teach him to fish and he can live for a lifetime"?
That's one thing. The other is that the Bear Fruit Roll strawberry is labeled as such, although it only contains 1% strawberries, mainly apples (65.8%), pears (32.9%)... This is an unparalleled "scam", customers are being taken for fools...
That's one thing. The other is that the Bear Fruit Roll strawberry is labeled as such, although it only contains 1% strawberries, mainly apples (65.8%), pears (32.9%)... This is an unparalleled "scam", customers are being taken for fools...
Those who classify nuts and co as healthy... nuts are good fats yes, but in the end they are very hearty... here the supplier is rather to blame, and certainly not Migros... I have also seen them in Rewe or Edeka...
Those who classify nuts and co as healthy... nuts are good fats yes, but in the end they are very hearty... here the supplier is rather to blame, and certainly not Migros... I have also seen them in Rewe or Edeka...
Nuts or natural products are certainly healthier than, for example, that artificially produced Bear Fruit Roll strawberry stuff (in which the main ingredient is not even the more expensive strawberries, but the cheaper apples and pears)... Yes, nuts are high in calories because they contain a lot of (healthy) fats. But you don't have to eat a whole packet (200g) of nuts at once ;-) Whereby is the supplier to blame and not Migros? Sorry, I don't quite understand...
Nuts or natural products are certainly healthier than, for example, that artificially produced Bear Fruit Roll strawberry stuff (in which the main ingredient is not even the more expensive strawberries, but the cheaper apples and pears)... Yes, nuts are high in calories because they contain a lot of (healthy) fats. But you don't have to eat a whole packet (200g) of nuts at once ;-) Whereby is the supplier to blame and not Migros? Sorry, I don't quite understand...
This is not a Migros label scam, but the supplier. Lotus is behind this company (like the cream)... No, I was referring to statements that I often read. Nuts are healthy, fructose is less bad than simple sugar etc... No, in the end it doesn't matter whether it's healthy fat or natural sugar... both are reflected in the calorie balance. Nuts are delicious and have super healthy fats, yes... they have great properties... But in the end, nobody will lose weight because of them... because they are a calorie bomb (because the volume is very small)
This is not a Migros label scam, but the supplier. Lotus is behind this company (like the cream)... No, I was referring to statements that I often read. Nuts are healthy, fructose is less bad than simple sugar etc... No, in the end it doesn't matter whether it's healthy fat or natural sugar... both are reflected in the calorie balance. Nuts are delicious and have super healthy fats, yes... they have great properties... But in the end, nobody will lose weight because of them... because they are a calorie bomb (because the volume is very small)
It is already a Migros label fraud because you buy this product from Migros as a customer. In the case of fraudulent labeling, the company that sells such fraudulent labeling products is denounced, not the supplier. This has always been the case, because the fraudulent label products are submitted by consumers to the Kassensturz. And as far as nuts etc. are concerned: if you want to lose weight, you need a calorie deficit; this has always been the case and will always remain so, you have to eat less "energy" (calories) than you consume (no matter what some popular influencers, fitness models or similar wannabe nutritionists on IG, Tiktok, YT, FB etc. want you to believe). You can also lose weight with nuts, and you can even lose weight with burgers, donuts, chocolate cake, croissants, bread, pasta, sausage, cheese, cookies, cakes, etc. It's all just a question of energy balance/calorie deficit.
It is already a Migros label fraud because you buy this product from Migros as a customer. In the case of fraudulent labeling, the company that sells such fraudulent labeling products is denounced, not the supplier. This has always been the case, because the fraudulent label products are submitted by consumers to the Kassensturz. And as far as nuts etc. are concerned: if you want to lose weight, you need a calorie deficit; this has always been the case and will always remain so, you have to eat less "energy" (calories) than you consume (no matter what some popular influencers, fitness models or similar wannabe nutritionists on IG, Tiktok, YT, FB etc. want you to believe). You can also lose weight with nuts, and you can even lose weight with burgers, donuts, chocolate cake, croissants, bread, pasta, sausage, cheese, cookies, cakes, etc. It's all just a question of energy balance/calorie deficit.
Exactly, I have also lost weight with daily crossaint... but many people identify with nuts that they are healthy and can be used to lose weight. Well, I don't see it that way. The SRG can google who owns the product and write to them. Kassensturz also writes to the supplier and not the seller as soon as their product performs badly...
How did you come up with nuts? But it's not about losing weight, btw.
I think the thread is probably not about the actual fraudulent labeling of the Bear Fruit Roll strawberry itself (= that it only contains 1% strawberries, the rest is apples and pears), but about the fact that "Migros claims in the Kassensturz about the origin of the Fruit Rolls strawberry (with 1% strawberry) from South Africa regarding customer complaints about the very long transport route", "that this is a customer need to send snacks halfway around the world". In short: Migros has this product in its range because customers would allegedly like these snacks to be sent halfway around the world. That's why Coacoa200 wrote: "But you don't care that pecan nuts come from the USA... didn't know that the nuts generally grow so abundantly in Europe...". And that's probably why it was about nuts afterwards...
I think the thread is probably not about the actual fraudulent labeling of the Bear Fruit Roll strawberry itself (= that it only contains 1% strawberries, the rest is apples and pears), but about the fact that "Migros claims in the Kassensturz about the origin of the Fruit Rolls strawberry (with 1% strawberry) from South Africa regarding customer complaints about the very long transport route", "that this is a customer need to send snacks halfway around the world". In short: Migros has this product in its range because customers would allegedly like these snacks to be sent halfway around the world. That's why Coacoa200 wrote: "But you don't care that pecan nuts come from the USA... didn't know that the nuts generally grow so abundantly in Europe...". And that's probably why it was about nuts afterwards...
Haha yes exactly For me it's often about what people complain about, but on the other hand it doesn't matter what you consume. People complain about such things, but then eat bananas or avocados every day, some of which don't grow in Europe either... About the product: you can write to the company and ask why the strawberries come from there? I don't see Migros as being to blame here... if people don't buy it, the product will certainly soon be removed from the range....I always ask myself what people are complaining about... Nobody is forced to buy it... And if there is no demand, it will be removed anyway....
