Precautionary product recall: Alnatura smoked tofu (non-refrigerated)

Vorsorglicher Produkt-Rückruf: Alnatura Räuchertofu (ungekühlt haltbar)

Guest

A few packs of Alnatura smoked tofu with the best-before date 20.04.2016 may incorrectly contain almond nut tofu.

The error occurred during the labeling of the product. In order not to endanger people who are allergic to almonds and nuts, Alnatura is recalling the batch with the best-before date 20.04.2016 as a precautionary measure.

The company is asking customers who are allergic to almonds and nuts and have a pack of the aforementioned Alnatura smoked tofu at home not to consume the product and to return it. Customers will of course receive a replacement.

The almond and nut particles are clearly visible when the product is cut open. In comparison, the smoked tofu does not contain any chunky ingredients and has a smooth consistency.

People who are not allergic to almonds or nuts can safely consume the product. Other batches of the product and other Alnatura tofu products (including the Alnatura tofu from the chilled counter) are not affected.

Source: http://www.alnatura.de/de-de/ueber-uns/presse/archiv-2015/produkt-rueckruf-raeuchertofu-haltbar

(Machine translation)

All replies (7)

Guest

Hello tigercat47

The information you are posting here is correct - Alnatura is recalling a specific batch of smoked tofu. Important: Migros is not affected. The batch with the best-before date in question was not delivered to us. Therefore, no recall is necessary in Switzerland.

There is therefore no danger for almond and nut allergy sufferers. Otherwise we would of course have reacted immediately and informed you.

Kind regards
Tanja

(Machine translation)

Guest

Hello Tanja,
I read it late last night in the German Teletext, if you want you can delete the post again greetings and have a nice evening

(Machine translation)

Guest

no no, nothing will be deleted here. It's just important that the allergy sufferers here know that we are not affected.

We're glad we have attentive customers like you, so nothing is forgotten.

Best regards

Tanja

(Machine translation)

Guest

Tanja,

it would be much more important for Migros (and other major distributors) to improve their communication . ....

For example, if such a recalled product was bought by someone who has a Cumulus card ... you can easily and immediately send an e-mail to this buyer warning him. There is an urgent need for the Cumulus card to be used for more than just relieving customers of their data.

brainstuff

(Machine translation)

Frederica

@deactivated user

I find the idea of sending an e-mail questionable.

What would your partner think if she received a message telling her to check the condoms she bought on day X for lot no. XYZ? But the person you wrote to has never bought and used "Regenmänteli"!

Best wishes and have a nice evening
Istanbul

(Machine translation)

Guest

Hello@deactivated user

This is already being done. Customers who have shown the Cumulus card will be informed either by letter or by e-mail (depending on whether or not an e-mail address is stored).

Best regards

Tanja

(Machine translation)

Guest

Tanja,

If Migros sends emails to Cumulus customer card holders, then that is actually to be welcomed ... but, like many things at the moment, it's a nice idea ... but worthless in terms of logistics. Emails from companies like Migros often arrive in SPAM ... and the mania for "personalization" of sender addresses leads to even more emails ending up in SPAM.

Inexperienced, clumsy employees, from almost all companies, are not trained to the fact that emails with "personalized" email sender addresses very often end up in SPAM (these addresses are not in the address directory, which some idiot has converted into a database for acceptable sender addresses).

My colleagues, some of whom are totally crazy, are constantly inventing "tournarraounds" to curb the SPAM madness. But this doesn't lead to any improvement, it just complicates everything even more. At the moment I'm arguing with the server staff on my own servers because one of these idiots wants to impose a total nonsense to "prevent" spoofing.

Even people like me, who run their own email server, no longer know which idiots are "sorting" and "filtering" the emails, where, how and why.

There are also "objections", as in a comment in this thread ... where people are afraid that their partner might see in a "warning email" that they have posted "sexy lingerie" that doesn't suit the wife ... this is only a problem because it is not ensured from the outset that email is personal and that the spouse cannot and does not want to read it (the latter is a "parenting issue" ... if my "bunny" reads my emails ... then I pull her "smartphone" in!!!!).

Warnings about product defects have to arrive reliably and quickly. A letter is usually too slow. That's why we need to improve email so that mails arrive reliably.

It is unacceptable and frightening that even such warning emails from the "Bund" (no-reply@news.admin.ch) do not arrive reliably.

brainstuff

(Machine translation)