Why did they change the layout? I search myself silly. Either dozens of products have been removed from the database, or the search function is not working properly. Where can I find the nutritional values? Sorry, but it's just crap what has been done...
Why did they change the layout? I search myself silly. Either dozens of products have been removed from the database, or the search function is not working properly. Where can I find the nutritional values? Sorry, but it's just crap what has been done...
Hello Lady Nivea,
You can find the nutritional values on the respective product page if you click on "Product information" (under the product image). In my experience, the nutritional information is available for most products.
I personally like the new layout. Especially the many functions and the new categories.
However, I have lost the overview on the start page, as the rated products are now also displayed, as well as all other activities (e.g. ideas for campaigns). And no longer just the comments on the products.
I also find it a bit of a shame that the user picture no longer appears next to a comment, but the product picture instead. - This makes it a little difficult to recognize at first glance who wrote the comment.
But apart from that, the Migipedia programmers have done a great job!
Hello Lady Nivea,
You can find the nutritional values on the respective product page if you click on "Product information" (under the product image). In my experience, the nutritional information is available for most products.
I personally like the new layout. Especially the many functions and the new categories.
However, I have lost the overview on the start page, as the rated products are now also displayed, as well as all other activities (e.g. ideas for campaigns). And no longer just the comments on the products.
I also find it a bit of a shame that the user picture no longer appears next to a comment, but the product picture instead. - This makes it a little difficult to recognize at first glance who wrote the comment.
But apart from that, the Migipedia programmers have done a great job!
PS: Regarding the search: The search bar at the top right is a little easier to "handle" e.g. Simply enter "honey", wait a little until the suggestions are loaded, and then click on the other results below
@Rebecca07: that's right, it is (also in my opinion) primarily the start page which - not least because of the "possibility of comparison" with the earlier Migipedia version - impairs the overview and orientation.
I also find the fact that it is less clear/quick to see who has written a comment/idea very unfortunate. Also that "replies" to the various contributions are not immediately visible.
The considerably "larger" display is great, even if it is unfortunately only visible after several (more than on the previous version) "clicks".
Guest
Hello Lady Nivea, Rebecca07 and Maripac
Thank you very much for your contributions and the detailed feedback you have included. I will be happy to pass them on to those responsible. They will be delighted with the praise and at the same time take the criticism seriously and examine it.
Kind regards
Tanja, Migipedia team
Hello Tanja,
THANK YOU for forwarding this.
Any "points of criticism" should NEVER be taken negatively - and are always posted from a subjective perspective. What X might consider annoying/worthy of improvement etc., Y or Z might never have noticed or at least would not have been worth a comment etc. (ALSO) There is a HUGE amount of work (certainly not always joyful) behind the new Migipedia version and that - AND the result - already deserves praise. From my point of view (which will differ from that of someone X,Y,Z), at best only 5 or 6 points would be worth changing and the TOP page, with its new, pleasantly enlarged design, is also better than the "previous" version.
With regard to another (rather discussion than "criticism") point, I am undecided as to where it would be best placed [if at all], whether here or as a comment in the "News" section of Migipedia. Whether and how often other Migipedia users have made/make similar observations is also beyond me. But in everyday interactions since Migipedia was launched, I have unfortunately noticed time and again that many people have NO idea what Migipedia is:(. Apart from the possibility that this subjective perception is simply based on unfavorable coincidences, I have considered on various occasions why this might be the case. Unfortunately, the only thing that has 'caught my eye' so far is that comparatively few detailed or 'hard-hitting' articles about Migipedia have appeared in Migros Magazine, Vivai and other newsletters. In addition, the 3 sources of information mentioned are perhaps only regularly consulted in certain groups of households. In addition, perhaps the three information sources mentioned are only regularly consulted by certain groups of households and the relatively small references to Migipedia are more or less 'overlooked'? In a kind of survey on what (e.g.) "Miggi" and "Migipedia" are (and what the respective symbols are), it is very likely that the former would score much higher in terms of awareness. HOW best to explain Migipedia? [responding to reactions of the type "oh well...and what's the point?"] WHAT are the "best" arguments for visiting the site from time to time? WHERE/ in WHAT direction(s) should "Migipedia continue to develop" so that the platform finds long-term approval, influx instead of 'departure'? Are the above observations mostly incorrect/ exceptions? I very much hope so.
Best wishes also to you AND, AS ALWAYS, to the entire Migipedia team
PS: Regarding the search: The search bar at the top right is a little easier to "handle" e.g. Simply enter "honey", wait a little until the suggestions are loaded, and then click on the other results below
@Rebecca07: that's right, it is (also in my opinion) primarily the start page which - not least because of the "possibility of comparison" with the earlier Migipedia version - impairs the overview and orientation.
I also find the fact that it is less clear/quick to see who has written a comment/idea very unfortunate. Also that "replies" to the various contributions are not immediately visible.
The considerably "larger" display is great, even if it is unfortunately only visible after several (more than on the previous version) "clicks".
Guest
Hello Lady Nivea, Rebecca07 and Maripac
Thank you very much for your contributions and the detailed feedback you have included. I will be happy to pass them on to those responsible. They will be delighted with the praise and at the same time take the criticism seriously and examine it.
Kind regards
Tanja, Migipedia team
Hello Tanja,
THANK YOU for forwarding this.
Any "points of criticism" should NEVER be taken negatively - and are always posted from a subjective perspective. What X might consider annoying/worthy of improvement etc., Y or Z might never have noticed or at least would not have been worth a comment etc. (ALSO) There is a HUGE amount of work (certainly not always joyful) behind the new Migipedia version and that - AND the result - already deserves praise. From my point of view (which will differ from that of someone X,Y,Z), at best only 5 or 6 points would be worth changing and the TOP page, with its new, pleasantly enlarged design, is also better than the "previous" version.
With regard to another (rather discussion than "criticism") point, I am undecided as to where it would be best placed [if at all], whether here or as a comment in the "News" section of Migipedia. Whether and how often other Migipedia users have made/make similar observations is also beyond me. But in everyday interactions since Migipedia was launched, I have unfortunately noticed time and again that many people have NO idea what Migipedia is:(. Apart from the possibility that this subjective perception is simply based on unfavorable coincidences, I have considered on various occasions why this might be the case. Unfortunately, the only thing that has 'caught my eye' so far is that comparatively few detailed or 'hard-hitting' articles about Migipedia have appeared in Migros Magazine, Vivai and other newsletters. In addition, the 3 sources of information mentioned are perhaps only regularly consulted in certain groups of households. In addition, perhaps the three information sources mentioned are only regularly consulted by certain groups of households and the relatively small references to Migipedia are more or less 'overlooked'? In a kind of survey on what (e.g.) "Miggi" and "Migipedia" are (and what the respective symbols are), it is very likely that the former would score much higher in terms of awareness. HOW best to explain Migipedia? [responding to reactions of the type "oh well...and what's the point?"] WHAT are the "best" arguments for visiting the site from time to time? WHERE/ in WHAT direction(s) should "Migipedia continue to develop" so that the platform finds long-term approval, influx instead of 'departure'? Are the above observations mostly incorrect/ exceptions? I very much hope so.
Best wishes also to you AND, AS ALWAYS, to the entire Migipedia team
