if i remember, migros was proud to say that the 5 rappen for the bag massively reduced the consumption. it was green, ecological and what else do i know, just the usual bla bla bla... when i now read in 20min what it says about the christmas decoration (fur from india), then it is clear to me that these 5 rappen are not for the environment but simply for the own bag. and the people out there still believe that migros is the savior and untouchable...
Hello Pogonox The proceeds from the 5 Rappensäckli will be donated in full to environmental organizations. You out there can even decide which of the selected projects receive how much. I don't quite understand why you are now criticizing or doubting this in this context. Because the one has nothing to do with the other. 20 Minuten article. Much has already been said, I could simply repeat myself. What was unfortunately not mentioned in the article is the following: These animals were not bred or killed for their fur. The fur is a leftover because the meat was utilized. Otherwise the fur would probably just be thrown away. So it is still used. That's not to say that it's okay per se to produce, sell, own or use fur products. But let's leave aside the fact that we are the big bad Migros that wants to sugarcoat everything (that's how I think you see us). Isn't it not so bad if something that would otherwise end up as waste is still being used? Nevertheless, and that's what the article says: They will look to ensure that no more such items are sold in the future. Unfortunately, I can't promise you anything definitive at this point. I would like to, because I personally think it should be possible without it. However, many people seem to buy such products. What I can say with certainty is that we are collecting customer feedback on all channels and that the issue is being addressed. And I would still like to emphasize once again that our suppliers have to comply with various standards, that independent checks are carried out and that Made in India does not mean that conditions are like the Stone Age. Less prejudice is also appropriate here. Kind regards, Nina
Counter question @Nina_Migros was someone from the team in India on site and saw how the skins are processed? They are chemically treated, it cannot be denied that workers from the lowest castes stand with bare feet in the lye. Has it been checked, eye to eye, what the situation is like? I would be very interested to know.
Hello Bodenseeknusperli. Of course I wasn't there in person, and neither were my online colleagues. I would have to ask if they were there from the product purchasing side. But we do have an office in India, I don't know if you know that. The people there also visit our suppliers. I really can't say exactly who goes there and when. But I can understand your thoughts on this question very well, I've had similar thoughts myself. And I would welcome more information on this. Perhaps this matter will trigger something like that. Only if we then ran a report on production facilities in India in Migros magazine. Would people believe it? Or would they think we were glossing over something? Because people don't really believe the labels and standards and contracts and controls either. Of course, paper is patient, templates are all well and good. I feel the same way, I'm particularly critical when I read Made in India on a product like this. And you can and should be critical. But you have to be able to trust something somewhere. There can't always be someone standing next to a production facility or manufacturer checking every step. And even if someone were standing there, do we believe this person when they say that everything is OK? I know that the circumstances in India are different to those in other countries. I have perhaps deliberately exaggerated this a little with all the questions and considerations. I simply want to say that we are certainly doing everything we can to ensure that neither people nor animals are harmed. (Yes, I know, this is about a dead animal, but you know what I mean...) So that companies don't exploit their workers. And that there are also companies in such countries that are decent. But I'd be happy to try and find out if/who has ever been there and what there is to report. Kind regards, Nina
You seem to be well informed from 20 minutes! But you don't realize that environmental protection starts at home. Everyone can decide whether they prefer to use the comfortable bags, or perhaps buy the available textile bags once?!!! The fact that cheap animal skins from "somewhere" cause severe environmental damage, child labor, and general damage to the environment and health of ALL those involved (including us consumers) should be well known by now, even to less well-informed consumers, and are caused by people who buy them despite knowing better! To reassure you: Quality always prevails over time!
@Tapio who was your message to? Sorry for asking:)
Sorry Bodenseeknusperli That was a reply to "Fur and 5 Rappen-Säckli" by Pognox Greetings Tapio
@Tapio who was your message to? Sorry for asking:)
@Bodenseeknusperli If there is no indication in a post which comment was replied to, the reply was made directly to the opening post.
@Nina_Migros that's absolutely true, trust has to start somewhere but pictures that are not embellished together with a report are a basis for this. I'm not naive, but I'm also not an aluminium hat wearer who suspects fake news everywhere. And no, not everything is just exploitation "in such countries" (I assume there is no insinuation that you think disparagingly of India because you express concerns) the same applies to the Cucina Tavola series from China. You just hear things, things are uncovered that make you suspicious and leave a bad taste in your mouth. Incidentally, this also applies "in countries like Switzerland" because, not everyone, but some simply don't want to support injustice. But still, I would personally find a few more reports very interesting :)
@Bodenseeknusperli I like to bring the idea with the "background reports" (I just say that now) with us. :) You could do reports like that with various other topics. On the one hand, it would be interesting and exciting anyway, and on the other hand it would also shed light on the subject. Nevertheless, I'm sure that someone will scream "whitewash" ;) We can make a bet when the time comes ;D While we're on the subject, have you seen the article on the Pelati production? That just occurred to me... We were there with Kassensturz at Longobardi in the field and in processing. That's another area where there's a lot of exploitation. The article sheds light on this side but also on what our supplier is doing to prevent this exploitation. Here is the link if you are not familiar with it: https://www.srf.ch/news/schweiz/ausgebeutete-erntehelfer-sklavenartige-arbeitsbedingungen-auf-pelati-plantagen In any case, this is exactly one example of why it is clear that people are critical and do not simply believe us when we say no no, it's not like that with us. But unfortunately, sometimes we can't do more than simply list what we do and what we pay attention to. And that's why I like to appeal to people not to forget that there are good things everywhere, and unfortunately also bad things everywhere, even where you wouldn't expect it. That was my word for Friday ;) I wish you and everyone else a great weekend! Best regards, Nina
You seem to be well informed from 20 minutes! But you don't realize that environmental protection starts at home. Everyone can decide whether they prefer to use the comfortable bags, or perhaps buy the available textile bags once?!!! The fact that cheap animal skins from "somewhere" cause severe environmental damage, child labor, and general damage to the environment and health of ALL those involved (including us consumers) should be well known by now, even to less well-informed consumers, and are caused by people who buy them despite knowing better! To reassure you: Quality always prevails over time!
my point is that migros plays holy but in the end is just profit-oriented. i personally think it's cheeky that i have to pay for bags and parking when i go shopping. that's just part of a premium brand. or are we supposed to pay for the elevator, the shopping cart and a service fee when we pay at a manned checkout?
my point is that migros plays holy but in the end is just profit-oriented. i personally think it's cheeky that i have to pay for bags and parking when i go shopping. that's just part of a premium brand. or are we supposed to pay for the elevator, the shopping cart and a service fee when we pay at a manned checkout?
As I said, dear Pogonox, environmental protection starts at home. YOU decide whether you drive to the nearest or largest center by car or store in the village store. PS: I have never seen Migros consider itself "holy".
